Cancer: A Controversial Subject
Do People “Attack” the CCRG Concept?
Yes…. a few detractors who don’t know what we have to offer or that are
just unilaterally against most complementary medical approaches do
attack our work and the work of many other complementary medicine
practitioners. A few individuals engage in a systematic campaign of
harassment and attack against the complementary medicine practitioners.
With all the obvious recognized failings of our conventional health care
system, one has to ask how complementary medicine detractors can
legitimately attack practitioners for suggesting that better foods
should be increased in the diet, or that stress management could help
the body fight disease, or that it would be healthy to stop eating the
processed and carcinogenic, saturated fat-laden foods that are
commonplace in our culture or for suggesting that we take high quality,
pathogen free supplements?
CCRG and its founder, William O’Neill, have been the subject of a recent
tabloid style, investigative journalism TV program. The show was a
one-sided and grossly distorted representation of the work at the CCRG
clinic. This latest “witch hunt” effort is really no more than a
continuation of the same negative heckling available about complementary
medicine and about CCRG on the internet. You only have to surf the web
to read the largely unsubstantiated attacks focused on the entire
complementary and alternative healthcare industry…….. all of which
primarily originate from three central web resources. Unfortunately,
this extremely negative and one-sided advocacy against any and all forms
of complementary or alternative medicine hinders all the sincere efforts
by practitioners throughout the industry and only further reinforces
today’s conventional medicine attitude of turning a “blind-eye” to
complementary and alternative medicine resources.
There is never any win in answering negative press with more negative
energy. Unfortunately in the media, you are “guilty until proven
innocent”. You need to make your health care decisions based on
reasonable scientific and clinical evidence instead of being told what
to do by special interest groups. The intent of this web section is to
leave you with the facts (that the detractors typically don’t provide)
so that you can make your own balanced decisions about the malicious
messages conveyed by a few self-proclaimed “guardians” of Canadian and
America health care.
Top of Page |